A discussion forum for history enthusiasts everywhere
 
HomeHome  ShortcutsShortcuts  FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  

Share | 
 

 Cecil Rhodes: Remain or Fall

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
Dirk Marinus
Aediles


Posts : 62
Join date : 2016-02-03

PostSubject: Cecil Rhodes: Remain or Fall   Wed 30 Mar 2016, 18:28

Oxford University and Idiot Control -excellent article



Rhodes must fall comeback

The inconvenient truth is told by a Brit who stands up to the militant PC brigade

The news agenda is often driven by those whose stories appeal to the politically correct. We’re seeing it again in the latest attempt to dump long-gone South African mining magnate Cecil John Rhodes into history’s dumpster. SA students have already had Rhodes' bronze statue removed from Cape Town University and now demand that Britain follows suit.

Two SA students at Oxford University, one the recipient of a Rhodes Scholarship, are campaigning to have a statue of the long gone colonial icon removed from Oriel College.

Over the weekend, former SA President FW de Klerk weighed in against them with a letter to The Times of London. A far more aggressive retort was delivered by leading British columnist James Delingpole. He has followed it up with the scalding piece republished with his permission below, headlined :
 

Mud Huts v Western Civilisation.

“Dear students,

Cecil Rhodes’s generous bequest has contributed greatly to the comfort and wellbeing of many generations of Oxford students – a good many of them, dare we say it, better, brighter and more deserving than you.

This doesn’t necessarily mean we approve of everything Rhodes did in his lifetime – but then we don’t have to. Cecil Rhodes died over a century ago.

Oxford, let us remind you, is the world’s second oldest extant university. Scholars have been studying here since at least the 11th century.

We’ve played a major part in the invention of Western civilisation, from the 12th century intellectual renaissance through the Enlightenment and beyond.

Our alumni include William of Ockham, Roger Bacon, William Tyndale, John Donne, Sir Walter Raleigh, Erasmus, Sir Christopher Wren, William Penn, Rep. Adam Smith (D-WA), Samuel Johnson, Robert Hooke, William Morris, Oscar Wilde, Emily Davison, Cardinal Newman. We’re a big deal. And most of the people privileged to come and study here are conscious of what a big deal we are. Oxford is their alma mater – their dear mother – and they respect and revere her accordingly.

But let’s be brutally honest here… The contribution of the Bantu tribes to modern civilisation has been as near as damn it to ‘zilch’.

You’ll probably say that’s “racist”. But it’s what we here at Oxford prefer to call “true.”

Perhaps the rules are different at other universities. In fact, we know things are different at other universities. We’ve watched with horror at what has been happening across the pond from the University of Missouri to the University of Virginia and even to reverend institutions like Harvard and Yale: the “safe spaces”; the black lives matter; the creeping cultural relativism; the stifling political correctness; what Allan Bloom rightly called “the closing of the American mind”.

At Oxford however, we will always prefer facts and free, open debate to petty grievance-mongering, identity politics and empty sloganeering. The day we cease to do so is the day we lose the right to call ourselves the world’s greatest university.

Of course, you are perfectly within your rights to squander your time at Oxford on silly, vexatious, single-issue political campaigns. (Though it does make us wonder how stringent the vetting procedure is these days for Rhodes scholarships and even more so, for Mandela Rhodes scholarships)

We are well-used to seeing undergraduates – or, in your case – postgraduates, making idiots of themselves. Just don’t expect us to indulge your idiocy, let alone genuflect before it. You may be black – “BME” as the grisly modern terminology has it – but we are colour-blind. We have been educating gifted undergraduates from our former colonies, our Empire, our Commonwealth and beyond for many Generations. We do not discriminate over sex, race, colour or creed.

We do, however, discriminate according to Intellect.

That means, inter alia, that when our undergrads or post grads come up with fatuous ideas, we don’t pat them on the back, give them a red rosette and say: “Ooh, you’re black and you come from South Africa. What a clever chap you are!”

No. We prefer to see the quality of those ideas tested in the crucible of public debate. That’s another key part of the Oxford intellectual tradition you see: you can argue any damn thing you like but you need to be able to justify it with facts and logic – otherwise your idea is worthless.

This ludicrous notion you have that a bronze statue of Cecil Rhodes should be removed from Oriel College, because it’s symbolic of “institutional racism” and “white slavery”.

Well even if it is – which we dispute – so bloody what?

Any undergraduate so feeble-minded that they can’t pass a bronze statue without having their “safe space” violated really doesn’t deserve to be here. And besides, if we were to remove Rhodes’s statue on the premise that his life wasn’t blemish-free, where would we stop? As one of our alumni Dan Hannan has pointed out, Oriels’ other benefactors include two kings so awful – Edward II and Charles I – that their subjects had them killed.

The college opposite – Christ Church – was built by a murderous, thieving bully who bumped off two of his wives. Thomas Jefferson kept slaves: does that invalidate the US Constitution? Winston Churchill had unenlightened views about Muslims and India: was he then the wrong man to lead Britain in the War?”

Actually, we’ll go further than that. Your Rhodes Must Fall campaign is not merely fatuous but ugly, vandalistic and dangerous.

We agree with Oxford historian RW Johnson that what you are trying to do here is no different from what ISIS and the Al-Qaeda have been doing to artefacts in places like Mali and Syria.

You are murdering History.

And who are you, anyway, to be lecturing Oxford University on how it should order its affairs? Your #Rhodes mustfall campaign, we understand, originates in South Africa and was initiated by a black activist who told one of his lecturers “whites have to be killed”.

One of you – Sizwe Mpofu-Walsh – is the privileged son of a rich politician and a member of a party whose slogan is “Kill the Boer; Kill the Farmer”; another of you, Ntokozo Qwabe, who is only in Oxford as a beneficiary of a Rhodes Scholarship, has boasted about the need for: “socially conscious black students” to “dominate white universities, and do so ruthlessly and decisively!”

Great.

That’s just what Oxford University needs. Some cultural enrichment from the land of Winnie Mandela, burning tyre necklaces, an AIDS epidemic almost entirely the result of government indifference and ignorance, one of the world’s highest per capita murder rates, institutionalised corruption, tribal politics, anti-white racism and a collapsing economy.

Please name which of the above items you think will enhance the lives of the 22,000 students studying here at Oxford.

And then please explain what it is that makes your attention grabbing campaign to remove a listed statue from an Oxford college more urgent, more deserving than the desire of probably at least 20,000 of those 22,000 students to enjoy their time here unencumbered by the irritation of spoilt, ungrateful little tossers on scholarships they clearly don’t merit using racial politics and cheap guilt-tripping to ruin the life and fabric of our beloved University.

Understand us and understand this clearly:

You have everything to learn from us; we have nothing to learn from you!

Yours,

Oriel College, Oxford

James Delingpole is executive editor in the London office of Breitbart.com.
Back to top Go down
 

Cecil Rhodes: Remain or Fall

View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Res Historica History Forum :: The history of people ... :: Individuals-